National Homeland Security Knowledgebase Campaign websites

Wednesday, August 31, 2005

Conservative Governors endorse Blackwell

The following Press release is from the Blackwell campaign-----

###

Former Democrat Georgia Governor and U.S. Senator Zell Miller endorsed Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell for governor in a speech to Columbus pastors and church leaders yesterday, saying Blackwell has the courage to stick to his principles. Miller joins governors Mark Sanford of South Carolina and Rick Perry of Texas in endorsing Blackwell in the last five days.

'Ken is my kind of Republican,' said Miller. 'He knows what is right, wants to accomplish great things for Ohio and has the courage to stick to his principles.'

'Ken and I have often locked horns with our party leadership. For example, Ken championed Ohio's marriage amendment (Issue 1) last year and has always fought for lower taxes, even when he was the only Republican to do so,' Miller concluded.

Miller, a Marine Corps veteran, served Georgia as Governor from 1991 through 1999 and U.S. Senator from 2000 through 2004. Miller was a keynote speaker at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York City and leader of the Democrats for Bush campaign group in the 2004 election.

Blackwell currently enjoys a 15% lead in opinion surveys of Ohio Republicans over Auditor Betty Montgomery and Attorney General Jim Petro. Blackwell's July 2005 campaign finance report also topped Montgomery and Petro with 6,350 individual contributors and $1.24 million raised, and bested Democrat gubernatorial candidates Congressman Ted Strickland of Portsmouth or Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman in those categories as well.

###

Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Putting Cindy in Her Place

PUTTING CINDY IN HER PLACE

"Since I am not one to sugarcoat a subject I will start by simply saying: Ms. Sheehan is a liberal nut case who needs to be put in her place.  I know these are strong words to use against a 'grieving mother', but the time for grief is over. Ms. Sheehan's own hateful words ended her grievance. . . .

"I think it is time for our gloves to come off. Many columnists around the country have 'tip-toed' around the Sheehan controversy because they have respected the loss of her son. But now Ms. Sheehan is showing her true colors: Liberal activist, not loving mother. I think it is time to fight back. . . .

"Appeasers are directly responsible for the death of Ms. Sheehan's son, not George W. Bush. If the whole country was united for the war in Iraq, I doubt if the terrorists would have started their suicide bombing campaign.  Using this logic Ms. Sheehan has become the biggest terrorist in the world, not George W. Bush as she so eloquently stated. . . .

"One other point: Every time Ms. Sheehan opens her mouth in protest she is dragging the legacy of her son through liberal muck. Her son was a hero who volunteered to serve his county and died protecting the constitution. Now his mother has become a traitor who is using the war on terror to wage a war against a president whom she does not like."

- Columnist Steve Darnell in the Arab News of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Starving Charters

- From Review & Outlook, Wall Street Journal, 8/29/05

STARVING CHARTERS

"The 2002 No Child Left Behind Act says students in lousy public schools can transfer out, which has intensified the need for additional charter (schools). And while more states are giving kids the option to pick a charter alternative, demand far exceeds supply and waiting lists are common.

"One problem is that teachers unions use their political clout to weaken state charter laws or limit the ability to attend the schools. Some states cap charter enrollment (New Jersey), refuse to grant new charters to for-profit outfits (Connecticut), or restrict which official bodies can authorize charter school petitions (Arkansas and Georgia).

"But the worst tactic is simply to starve charter schools of money, says Chester Finn, who heads the Fordham Institute...

"The funding gap ranges from a few hundred dollars to upward of $5,000 per student; the national average is $1,800, or 21% less money for charters than for a district school. For a typical 250-student charter, this translates into a $450,000 budget gap, or eight more teachers or an after-school program with tutors for a small school."

- Review & Outlook, Wall Street Journal, 8/29/05

Antidote to Defeatism: Soldier Questions Media Coverage of Military Morale....

FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH


Contact: David Almasi
(202) 543-4110 x11 or dalmasi@nationalcenter.org

For Release: August 26, 2005

 

Antidote to Defeatism: Soldier Questions Media Coverage of Military Morale, Casualty Rates

The Washington Times has published today an op-ed from a soldier, Sgt. Joe Roche, who is criticizing the mainstream press for being "asphyxiated with defeatism":

...most of the media seems asphyxiated with defeatism. The message from most journalists would lead you to believe that we soldiers are getting out, that no one is joining anew and that we want to stop fighting. This simply isn't true.

Roche addresses military recruitment and retention rates:

Yes, recruitment is lower, but the caliber of those who are signing up and the rates of re-enlistment are both extremely high. All 10 of our major combat divisions are ahead of expectations for retention of soldiers. In my unit, there are soldiers who specifically went active duty from the reserves because they want to go to Iraq or Afghanistan. Before September 11, a lot of soldiers were happy to just enjoy the benefits. Since that day, those soldiers have left. That is fine and not the disaster that defeatist reports are making it seem. Such soldiers were never the types to want to go on long deployments and face combat. Yes, they were heroes for signing up and being in a job that could go that direction, but they had other priorities that made their service contingent on enjoying the benefits rather than serving in war....

Roche also addresses media coverage of U.S. military casualties in Iraq:

I don't know why the media insists on trumpeting the idea that all of us are tired and worn out and just want to stop fighting. I don't, and I am not alone. The fact is that we are not experiencing casualty rates anywhere near past conflicts, nor for that matter as bad as during peacetime. There were weeks in Vietnam when 350-400 Americans died, and in other wars thousands would die in single battles. Nothing like that is happening now.

Roche's entire article can be read in the Washington Times or on the National Center's website. Roche, who served in combat duty in Iraq with the 1st Armored Division, has written numerous commentaries about the progress of the war, the pro-American attitudes of many Iraqis, the morale of U.S. troops in Iraq and more. In 2004, President George W. Bush quoted Roche in his acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention, and the Smithsonian Institution in Washington later included a quote from Roche in a display entitled "The Price of Freedom." A partial archive of Joe Roche's writing about the war is available online.

The National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, non-profit educational foundation based in Washington, DC.

# # #

Gambling Grief

From American Policy Roundtable
 
Gambling Grief 
Thursday, August 25, 2005
In Broward County, Florida the papers will tell you there is nothing wrong with gambling.

Ask Bill Seitz, Ohio State Rep and he’ll tell you the same.

Ring up Governor Ed Rendell in Pennsylvania and he’ll sing the praises of legalized gambling casinos.

But you won’t here that song from Adecelli Snyder. In fact you won’t hear any more songs from the two-year old girl who was killed in Las Vegas by her mothers gambling addiction.

They found her body covered with sores and insect bites, in a trailers full of rotting garbage and rats.  She weighed only 11 pounds and died of starvation. She was born with cerebral palsy. Her mother and her boyfriend got state disability checks to keep Adecelli alive and well, but they spent the money in the casinos.

She has two young sisters who are alive and now in the custody of the County.

Sure alcoholics do this to their sick children. Drug addicts do the same.

But you don’t find many people hooked on the NFL or movies, or golf who starve their disabled children to death.

I know, gambling is just another harmless form of entertainment where no one gets hurt.

Isn’t it time we change that song in America.

Wherever you live–you can have a copy of this story. You can send it to your local paper, to your politicians, to your friends.

It’s the least we can do to remember another of God’s precious children lost because the grownups couldn’t handle the truth.

Gambling Grief - August 25th, 2005

Who is Hugo Chavez?

Who Is Hugo Chavez?

New York Sun Editorial
August 29, 2005

View online at:http://www.nysun.com/article/19294
 
For all the fuss about Pat Robertson's suggestion that America assassinate Hugo Chavez, there's been surprisingly little focus on just what Mr. Chavez has done to prompt such a rumination.

There's Mr. Chavez's extremist stance against America in the war on Islamic extremist terrorism. He opposed not only the Iraq war but even the effort to destroy Al Qaeda in Afghanistan after the attacks on America of September 11, 2001.

There's Mr. Chavez's treatment of his neighbors. A protege of Mr. Chavez, Evo Morales, for example, led the June demonstrations in Bolivia that resulted in the resignation of the pro-American president, Carlos Mesa. In his recent trip to Paraguay, Defense Secretary Rumsfeld said: "There is certainly evidence that both Cuba and Venezuela have been involved in the situation in Bolivia in unhelpful ways." FARC in Colombia, which the American government has designated a terrorist organization for its activities including car-bombing a Bogota nightclub, is another favorite of Mr. Chavez.

And then there's Mr. Chavez's treatment of Venezuela's own citizens. The State Department's "Country Reports on Human Rights Practices" for 2004 writes that the human rights group Red de Apoyo reported that on January 10, 2004, nine men were rounded up and executed. On March 10, Juan Carlos Zambrano "died after being beaten by soldiers who had detained him." His girlfriend was raped by the same soldiers. "On March 30, eight soldiers were burned in a punishment cell ... two of the soldiers died of their injuries." The State Department reports further that the International Association of Broadcasters complained that Mr. Chavez forces outlets to air his speeches.

Freedom House rates Venezuela as only "partly free" and said that Mr. Chavez's "victory" in August's recall vote was marked by credible reports from independent observers of "voter harassment, including physical intimidation and the reassignment of thousands of voters to far-away polling stations, and vote tampering."

None of this amounts to justification for the American government to assassinate Mr. Chavez, though we certainly wouldn't shed any tears if he were removed from power by some resourceful Venezuelans. But the contrast between the left's loud fuss over Rev. Robertson's comments and their silence about Mr. Chavez's actions signals that whatever its motivation, the furor surely doesn't stem from an evenhanded application of principles of nonviolence or human rights.



The New York Sun
105 Chambers Street, New York, NY 10007

A fair count for Congress

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

How the federal government counts people determines everything from Medicaid funding to the number of seats each state gets in Congress.

On the second point, Michigan counts less and less these days.

U.S. Rep. Candice Miller, R-Macomb County, has proposed a fairer and more sensible system for deciding the number of Congress members from each state. The measure, which would change the U.S. Constitution, deserves more than the cursory treatment it's likely to get.

Congressional reapportionment takes place every 10 years when new U.S. Census figures come out. Michigan has lost representation in the last few decades.

In 1960, the state had 19 congressional seats. Today, it has only 15. Southern and western states have steadily gained during the same time. The changes reflect population trends -- including an influx of illegal immigrants to the United States.

Why are illegal immigrants counted for purposes of representation? The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution requires that congressional seats be doled out on the basis of "the whole number of persons in each State" -- "persons," not "citizens."

The amendment was passed after the Civil War to grant citizenship to former slaves. It unwittingly bestowed something like citizenship on people in this country illegally by allowing them to be counted for the important purpose of deciding the basic structure of the federal government.

Ms. Miller's proposed amendment would change the word "persons" in the 14th Amendment to "citizens."

Had the change been in effect before the 2000 census, California would have had six fewer representatives in Congress. Michigan and Pennsylvania would not have lost one each, while Utah, Montana and Oklahoma would have each gained a representative.

Counting only citizens for the sake of determining how many people to have in Congress seems like common sense. Only citizens can vote and enjoy the full rights and privileges the country has to offer.

This should be separate from the larger and more complex problem of what to do about illegal immigrants. A bipartisan proposal in Congress that would create new visa categories for temporary workers and undertake other immigration reforms would move the country in the right direction.

Ms. Miller is raising an issue with huge consequences for Michigan and other seat-losing states. Reduced representation in Congress affects everything from our ability to get federal highway money to the control Michigan and surrounding states can exercise over Great Lakes water. That shouldn't be happening because of a growing number of non-citizens in the country.

Ms. Miller introduced her proposed amendment earlier this summer. It landed with a thud in the House Judiciary Committee. There it will likely stay.

The very problem Ms. Miller is fighting -- Michigan's waning congressional influence -- will likely doom her solution. Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate, and approval by three-fourths of state legislatures.

Representatives from states such as California and Texas, who benefit from the current count method, won't be in any hurry to change it.

Those dim prospects don't make Ms. Miller's proposal any less sound. In fact, the situation only reinforces the system's unfairness. Ms. Miller has made her point. Now, the vote should be called -- and counted.

view online...

http://www.mlive.com/news/grpress/index.ssf?/base/news-1/1124894797299960.xml&coll=6

Rep. LaTourette deserves Cleveland's gratitude

The following letter was published in the Plain Dealer on Aug. 29, 2005
 
I would like to thank Republican Rep. Steve LaTourette from Ohio's 14th District (which includes only a sliver of Cuyahoga County) for his hard work and dedication to the residents of Cleveland in fighting to keep the Defense Finance and Accounting Services facility operational.  More than 1,000 people are employed at this facility, and there is an additional possibility that instead of losing these jobs, we may actually gain more.
 
While Cleveland's congressional Democrats did very little to affect the outcome, a Republican from Lake County realized the serious nature and remifications of this possible closing and fought to represent the region's interests.  This move will not only keep jobs in Cleveland, but will also keep millions in payroll and tax revenue in our community.
 
Well done, Congressman LaTourette.
 
Steven M. Backiel
Painesville
 
(Backiel serves as Executive Director of the Cuyahoga County Republican Party)

Monday, August 29, 2005

Another Republican Jumps into the Secretary of State Race

What ever happened to the good old days when everyone just ran for President?

-RL

From RightAngleBlog

http://www.rightangleblog.blogspot.com/2005/08/another-republican-jumps-into.html

Another Republican Jumps into Secretary of State Race
"Dayton native Colin Beach has announced his candidacy for Ohio Secretary of State. "

"The Republican graduated from Capital University Law School in Columbus in May and had a kickoff for his campaign Monday morning at the Schuster Performing Arts Center."

"...others that have announced their candidacy include Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat from Franklin County, Greg Hartmann, a Republican from Hamilton County, and Jim Trakas, a Republican from Cuyahoga County. " Read the rest HERE.

I still have a feeling it will be Hartmann v. Trakas, unless someone can tell me more information on this Beach guy.

Thursday, August 25, 2005

Federal Election Commission press release on electioneering communication

HOME / PRESS OFFICE

FEC Home Page

August 24, 2005

ATTENTION: WIRE SERVICES, DAYBOOK EDITORS

 

FEC SEEKS COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULEMAKING

Washington - The Federal Election Commission is seeking comments on proposed changes to its rule defining “electioneering communications” under the Federal Election Campaign Act.  This rulemaking was prompted by the recent decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in Shays v. FEC.

Electioneering communications are broadcast, cable or satellite communications that refer to a clearly identified candidate for Federal office, are publicly distributed within 60 days before a general election or 30 days before a primary election, and are targeted to the relevant electorate.  Such communications carry certain reporting obligations and funding restrictions. The proposed changes would modify the definition of “publicly distributed” and also the exemptions to the definition of “electioneering communication.”

In modifying the existing regulations the Commission is considering a range of options:

  • retaining the section 501(c)(3) exemption and the state candidate exemption
  • narrowing the section 501(c)(3) exemption
  • repealing the current exemptions for section 501(c)(3) organizations and state candidates
  • replacing all the current exemptions with a broad new exemption covering all communications that do not promote, support, attack, or oppose a federal candidate

No final decision has been made by the Commission on the issues presented in this rulemaking.  The Notice was published in the Federal Register on August 23, 2005 (70 FR 49508) and can be found at http://www.fec.gov/pdf/nprm/exemption_doc_films/notice_2005-20.pdf.

  Comments are due on September 30, 2005.  A hearing on the proposed rules will be held on October 19, 2005.

All comments must be in writing, must be addressed to Ms. Mai T. Dinh, Assistant General Counsel, and must be submitted in either email, facsimile, or paper form. Email comments must be sent to either ECdef@fec.gov or submitted through the Federal eRegulations Portal at www.regulations.gov.  If the email comments include an attachment, it must be in Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) or Microsoft Word (.doc) format.  Faxed comments must be sent to (202) 219-3823, with paper copy follow-up to ensure legibility.  Written comments should be sent to the Federal Election Commission, 999 E Street, NW, Washington DC 20463

###

 

Tuesday, August 23, 2005

65 Girls at Canton School Pregnant

65 Girls At Area School Pregnant
WEWS NewsNet5.com

There are 490 female students at Timken High School, and 65 are pregnant, according to a recent report in the Canton Repository.

The article reported that some would say that movies, TV, videogames, lazy parents and lax discipline may all be to blame.

School officials are not sure they what has caused so many pregnancies, but in response to them, the school is launching a three-prong educational program to address pregnancy, prevention and parenting.

The newspaper also reported that students will face mounting tensions created by unplanned child-rearing responsibilities, causing students to quit school and plan for a GED. This will make it difficult for the Canton City School District to shake its academic watch designation by the state.

According to the Canton Health Department, statistics through July show that 104 of the 586 babies born to Canton residents in Aultman Hospital and Mercy Medical Center had mothers between 11 and 19.

The newspaper reports that the non-Canton rate was 7 percent. Canton was 15 percent.

Copyright © 2005 NewsNet5.com.

Court Won't Reconsider Property Case

By GINA HOLLAND Associated Press Writer

(AP) - WASHINGTON-The Supreme Court, given a chance to revisit a heavily criticized ruling, refused Monday to reconsider its decision giving local governments more power to seize people's homes for economic development.

So contentious was the court's narrow 5-4 ruling in the so-called eminent domain case earlier this year that some critics launched a campaign to seize Justice David Souter's farmhouse in New Hampshire to build a luxury hotel. Others singled out Justice Stephen Breyer's vacation home in the same state for use as a park.


Both Souter and Breyer voted on the prevailing side. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who did not, sharply criticized her colleagues at the time. She said in a minority opinion that the ruling favored the well-heeled over the less fortunate.

In addition, legislators in some 25 states are considering changing their eminent domain laws to soften the impact.

Justices did not comment Monday in refusing to reconsider the case, which had been expected because requests for a reconsideration of rulings are rarely granted.

O'Connor, whose decision to retire created the opening that Washington lawyer John Roberts now seeks to fill, wrote in her angry dissent of June that "the specter of condemnation hangs over all property."

Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the majority opinion and defended it last week in a speech in Las Vegas. The ruling was legally correct, he said, because the high court has "always allowed local policy-makers wide latitude in determining how best to achieve legitimate public goals."

But Stevens said he had concerns about the results.

"My own view is that the allocation of economic resources that result from the free play of market forces is more likely to produce acceptable results in the long run than the best-intentioned plans of public officials," Stevens told the Clark County Bar Association.

Legal experts had said they did not expect the court's ruling, involving an economic development project in New London, Conn., to prompt a rush to claim homes.

Stevens said that "the public outcry that greeted (the ruling) is some evidence that the political process is up to the task of addressing such policy concerns."

The case is Kelo v. City of New London, 04-108.

---

On the Net:

Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/

2005-08-22T16:09:01Z

Monday, August 22, 2005

Prayers for an Old Radical

 
The Window: A Catholic Look at Society, Culture and Politics
 
by Deal W. Hudson

In This Issue:

Prayers for an Old Radical

You still see Paul Weyrich's name now and then. He has been active in conservative politics for over thirty years. More importantly, Weyrich had the original vision of bringing people of faith into the political process. The involvement of religiously-active Catholics and Evangelicals - a decisive factor in recent elections - can be traced back to Weyrich's initiative in the early '70s.

Today Weyrich entered Georgetown Hospital in Washington, D.C., to have both of his legs amputated. He has been battling against a painful back condition for many years, but today he is in special need of our prayers. I wanted to pay tribute to him because he deserves our appreciation.

Paul Weyrich may be best known as co-founder in 1973, along with Ed Feulner, of the influential conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation. Moving on from there, in 1974 he created the Survival of a Free Congress, now the Free Congress Foundation, where he presides as Chairman and CEO to this day.

Less well known is the role he played at the beginning of the influx of Christians into politics, through such organizations as the Moral Majority and the Christian Coalition.

As Weyrich tells it, the attempt by the IRS during the Carter administration to strip Evangelical schools of their non-profit status created a moment that "galvanized the Christian community."

As both a major player and witness to the beginning of political involvement by Evangelicals, Weyrich remembers it "was not abortion, school prayer, or the ERA, [it was] Jimmy Carter's intervention against the Christian schools."

This led to a meeting between Weyrich and Jerry Falwell at a Holiday Inn in Lynchburg, VA in May, 1979. Falwell was not sure what he wanted to do, but Weyrich shared his vision: "Out there is what one might call a moral majority. . . . The key to any kind of political impact is to get these people united in some way."

Thus Falwell took the name and concept of his organization from a Catholic political strategist, Paul Weyrich.

In fact ten years later when Pat Robertson asked Ralph Reed to start the Christian Coalition, Reed sought Weyrich's advice in the viability of the project. Just as he had encouraged Falwell, Weyrich told Reed he should do it. "I probably would not have started the Coalition without Weyrich's encouragement," Reed told me recently.

Weyrich is a member and Deacon of the Melkite Greek Catholic Eparchy of Newton, an Eastern Orthodox Church in communion with Rome. Married in 1963, he and his wife Joyce have five children and 10 grandchildren, with another on the way. Ten years later he was ordained a Proto Deacon of his Church.

His contribution to American politics did not end with the groundbreaking work he accomplished helping Evangelical Christians enter politics. His mission at Free Congress has been to supply all the resources necessary to elect conservative political candidates: from the recruitment of candidates to training and mobilizing of conservative activists. In 1980 he was influential in getting an anti-abortion plank in the Republican platform.

Weyrich's rightly characterized himself as a radical: "We are different from previous generations of conservatives ... We are no longer working to preserve the status quo. We are radicals, working to overturn the present power structure of this country." He was one of the earliest commentators to recognize and advance the idea that our country was engaged in a "cultural civil war."

And his strategy succeeded: By the mid-1980's it was clear to the mainstream media that Paul is, as The Economist describes him in early 1988, "one of the conservative movement's more vigorous thinkers." In 1986, the National Journal recognized his achievements, placing him on their list of 150 Americans, "Who made a real difference."

His list of accomplishments is long.

During the 1980's and '90's Paul played an instrumental role in launching a number of organizations to help bring together disparate conservative groups. He founded the American Legislative Exchange Council, an organization of state legislators; he co-founded the Council for National Policy, a place for social conservatives to discuss and share ideas; with Richard Viguerie he became co-publisher of Conservative Digest magazine; and he served as national chairman of Coalitions for America, an association of conservative activist organizations.

His attempt to create a national conservative television network, called NET, did not succeed but testified to Weyrich's determination to fight the culture war where it really counted.

Since 1996 Paul has persevered with an increasingly disabling back injury. Now he faces recovery from a double amputation.

In his August 9, 2005 commentary, posted on the Free Congress web site, Weyrich begins to lay out his vision and the challenges for "the next conservatism."

Let's hope this old radical finds the strength and health to continue his historic work.


The Window is published by the Morley Institute for Church & Culture.

Americans Prefer Diplomacy Over Bombing Mecca

 


Press release from American Arab Institute
 

August 22, 2005

 

Washington- An Arab American Institute (AAI) poll conducted August 12-14 shows that by a margin of three-to-one, Americans overwhelmingly reject the suggestion made by US Congressman Tom Tancredo (R-CO) that in the event of another terrorist attack on American soil, the US should threaten to bomb holy sites in the Arab and Muslim world.    

 

"This poll should make it clear that Americans overwhelmingly reject Tancredo's dangerous threats," said AAI President James Zogby.

 

AAI requested the survey in response to the controversial remarks that Tancredo made on a radio show a few weeks ago. When asked what the US’s response should be if our cities were targets of another terrorist attack, Tancredo replied, “Well, what if you said something like, ‘If this happens in the United States, and we determine it is the result of extremist, fundamentalist Muslims, you know, you could take out their Holy Sites.’”  “You’re talking about bombing Mecca,” clarified the host.  “Yeah,” Tancredo affirmed.

 

Commenting on Tancredo’s remarks, the US Department of State said, “Such remarks…are insulting and offensive to us all.  Speaking on behalf of the United States Government, let [us] say that we respect Islam as a religion, we respect its holy sites.”  When asked whether they supported the position taken by the State Department or that taken by Tancredo, 68% supported the Department of State, while only 24% sided with Tancredo.

 

The preference for diplomacy over provocative threats was reinforced in response to other questions.  For example, when asked to evaluate their support for a number of approaches to combat terrorism, 83% strongly support the establishment of programs between Arab American and American Muslim communities and local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies to develop communication and trust.  Seventy-nine percent strongly support strengthening partnerships with moderate Arab and Muslim states, to share intelligence and cooperate in counter-terrorism operations.  However, when threatening to bomb Mecca was proposed, only 23% support that option, while 73% reject it.

Rice Statement on Iraqi Draft Constitution

 

Released by the U.S. Department of State

Secretary Condoleezza Rice
Washington, DC
August 22, 2005

I congratulate the Iraqi people and their leaders on the submission of a draft Constitution to Iraq’s Transitional National Assembly. In a statesmanlike decision, the men and women of the Assembly have decided to use the next three days to continue reaching out to build the broadest national consensus for Iraq’s new Constitution. Step by step, the Iraqi people are charting their own path toward a shared future of freedom.

Through extensive discussion among Iraqis -- including town meetings across the country, televised debates, and thousands of individual submissions -- Iraq’s Constitutional Committee has assembled this draft in accordance with Iraqi law. The process by which Iraqis have reached this point is historic and in the best tradition of democracy.

From Iraq’s first free elections in January, to the creation of an inclusive transitional government in the spring, to today’s draft Constitution, free Iraqis have shown determination and resolve in the face of extremism and violence. America admires the bravery of all Iraqis who are working peacefully for a democratic, secure, and prosperous Iraq, and we remain committed to assisting them.

2005/803



Released on August 22, 2005

Hartmann on Ohio Redistricting plan

Redistricting plans (bi)czar

August 22, 2005

by Greg Hartmann

The dictionary defines the word "czar" as a "tyrant" or "an appointed official having special powers to regulate or supervise an activity." A czar isn't elected and usually is resented by those he controls.

This year, proposals are pending in California and Ohio to remove elected officials from the process of drawing legislative and congressional districts and replace them with people who will essentially become redistricting czars. Czars didn't go over well in Russia centuries ago, and they won't go over well in America today.

Currently, elected leaders draw legislative district lines and are held accountable for those decisions at the ballot box. Americans can vote those leaders out of office if the districts are drawn in an unfair way. Yet, with a rallying theme that can be described only as "let's take the politics out of politics," a few dissidents want to change all that.

The Ohio proposal is particularly troubling because it is unabashedly anti-democratic. For example, being buddies with an Ohio judge would give you a better shot of serving on the unelected group of five redistricting czars. Two handpicked Ohio judges would be allowed to name anyone they want to draw the political lines that affect 11 million people. Those named could include the judge's daughter, brother-in-law or political crony. Then those special appointees could look to their own pool of friends and family to select the remaining three czars. It would be comical if it weren't downright scary.

And in both California and Ohio, the redistricting czars would be forced to replace common sense and good judgment with a series of arcane formulas that would give math geniuses a headache and creative trial lawyers a field day. Proponents bill this idea as non-partisan, but in reality, the czars could have a partisan political agenda but it would be much less visible to the public.

Both states are political proving grounds for new ideas. So, if adopted, expect to see these dubious proposals coming soon to a voting booth near you.

Let's keep the system that works. We elect people, they do the right thing or we vote them out. It's called accountability. It's a concept that's familiar and acceptable to everyone — except czars.

Greg Hartmann is the Clerk of Courts of Hamilton County, Ohio, and a Republican candidate for Ohio Secretary of State.

###

USA TODAY, Monday, August 22, 2005

Redistricting plans (bi)czar

 

Hartmann for Ohio


Connecticut Sues Feds Over No Child Left Behind Law

From Political State Report
August 22, 2005

The Associated Press reports that Connecticut’s Attorney General Richard Blumenthal filed a federal lawsuit today challenging the No Child Left Behind law.

The lawsuit asks a federal judge to declare that the federal government cannot require state and local money be used to meet federal testing goals.

Blumenthal has been talking about brining such lawsuit since last spring.

Connecticut has been administering its own mastery test for 20 years and wants to continue testing every other year. The federal law requires annual testing, and federal education officials have repeatedly denied the state’s requests for waivers.

Last week The Day reported that Connecticut’s Department of Education released test results showing the number of Connecticut elementary and middle schools failing to make adequate yearly progress under the No Child Left Behind act this year remained at 145, or 18 percent.

By: Dan Spencer, California Yankee
http://polstate.com/2005/08/22/ct-connecticut-sues-feds-over-no-child-left-behind-law/

Ohio Roundtable: Four Scams in Ohio

Today on the Public Square:
Monday, August 22, 2005
There are four scams out there designed to radically alter your state constitution.

This year Ohio voters face a real challenge.  Four proposed amendments are on the state ballot.  They all claim to be good for Ohioans.  All are scams.

The first comes from the Republicans. It is a rehashed version of the Third Frontier plan that voters rejected in 2003.  It has been renamed “Jobs for Ohio” in the hope of tricking voters into supporting it.

This issue will basically give the Governor $500 million to give away to companies of his choosing. Yes, its absolutely free money, and no – the amendment contains no protection against using tax dollars for fetal stem cell experiments and cloning.

The next three amendments will change the way Ohio does elections.  All of the Amendments are written by Democrat organizations and allies that lean to the far left.  The amendments aim to replace the role of the Secretary of State, place a constitutional ban on contributions over $1000 and replace the elected apportionment board with an appointed board.

All of that sounds confusing and most of us have no frame of reference on what it means, but the political lefties and the Republicans both like it that way.

All four of these measure are bad for Ohio in the long run because they take money from your pocketbook and place issues in Constitutional law that do not belong there.

Each group is trying to sneak one across on the voters.

Ohioans have a choice.  Just vote no on all four ballot issues.  Or stay home and don’t bother, or get the facts and go vote with conviction.

Its not too early to start.

The far left and the Republican insiders will spend millions to pull the wool over voters eyes in the next few weeks so its best to get the facts now.

Protect your constitution, the unborn, and your pocketbook by getting the facts.

Four Scams in Ohio - August 22nd, 2005

http://www.ohioroundtable.org/

Million Father March escorts children to school

Million Father March escorts children to school

By Brian DeBose
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
August 22, 2005

Cities across the country are calling on a million fathers to take a little time out of their busy morning routine, get to work a little late if necessary, so they can walk hand in hand with their children to the schoolhouse doors on the first day.
    The Million Father March, a pro-family and fatherhood initiative created by the Chicago-based Black Star Project, a black family advocacy group, is entering its second year, with 100 cities participating -- up from 25 cities in 2004, said Phillip Jackson, the organization's executive director. The marches began in Atlanta on Aug. 8, the earliest first day of school in the country and will continue through Oct. 1.
    "This has already had national implications, and it will get stronger and stronger and stronger; everybody is looking for the magic bullet in education, and this is it -- fatherhood support and involvement," Mr. Jackson said. "And there are other cities doing their own unrelated marches like one in St. Louis."
    Two marches will take place locally in the coming weeks, one in Prince George's County today and one in the District next Monday.
    Walter L. Dozier, education liaison for Prince George's Executive Jack B. Johnson, said the countywide "Embrace Our Village" march will involve parents, students and volunteers at nearly all 199 public schools in Prince George's County.
    "It appears that Prince George's is the only march being led by county government officials and the school system," Mr. Dozier said.
    The march starts at 7 a.m. with a rally at William W. Hall Elementary School in Capitol Heights, led by interim superintendent Howard Burnett.
    "We want our parents to be engaged, informed and empowered," Mr. Johnson said. "The education of our children must be a community partnership and commitment."
    Mr. Dozier said the county government has partnered with the Chamber of Commerce, the paren-teacher association, more than 200 churches and other community groups to organize and recruit volunteers.
    "We're very excited but we're still in the process of organizing, so we're not sure what the final count of volunteers will be," said Steve Martin of the Ark of Safety Christian Church in Oxon Hill. "We have 200 churches in Clergy United, and all of the pastors have asked their members to help, so we are sure we will have a good solid number of volunteers out walking our children to school."
    In the District, Abeo Anderson, 25, an education policy associate with the National Black Caucus of State Legislators, said her efforts to organize enough men are going well. She found out about the march through her work with Mr. Jackson.
    "This weekend, we are going to send out an invitation letter, organizing tips for school principals to organize, and a flier to post at various locations in D.C.," Miss Anderson said.
    An American University graduate student and native Washingtonian, she said she could not turn away from an opportunity to "take on a leadership role in emphasizing the importance of fathers and parents as a role model for youth."
    She said she was inspired by her father, Kamau Anderson.
    "As one of seven children whose father has played the biggest role model for us, I see that fathers need to take a leadership role in the education of their children; it just has to be done," Miss Anderson said.
    That was the same type of inspiration that inspired Mr. Jackson to move forward with the fathers march two years ago.
    "We want to give homage to Minister Louis Farrakhan and the Million Man March ... but what inspired us was a tradition in South America where fathers every year take off work to go to school and thank the teachers for teaching their children," he said. "We thought what would it do and what would it be like for black men to take control of the education of their children, and this is a part of that mechanism."

Ohio Democrats prepare for upcoming elections

From the Ohio News Network:
 
Pickaway County
Democrats Prepare for Upcoming Elections

Ohio Democrats gathered in Pickaway County Sunday night to prepare their run for many of the state's key government offices.

Encouraged by recent republican run statehouse scandals democrats what their eyes set of everything from the governor to the secretary of state.

Columbus Mayor Michael Coleman and Congressman Ted Strickland were the guests of honor, both have announced plans to run for governor.

On the other side of the aisle the Republican gubernatorial candidates are Ken Blackwell and Betty Montgomery, and Jim Petro.

Democratic Leader Asks For Explanation Of Impeachment Process

Columbus
Democratic Leader Asks For Explanation Of Impeachment Process

House Democrats are asking the Legislature's legal research arm to explain the process of impeachment against Governor Bob Taft.

     

The Republican was convicted last week of four ethics law violations for failing to report golf outings and other gifts.

     

The Democrats will meet Tuesday to discuss their response to Taft's conviction. House Democratic leader Chris Redfern says today that his members only want to understand the complicated

impeachment process.

     

Democrats will consider alternative responses, such as asking the governor to resign.

     

Democrats would need votes from Republicans who control the House to pursue impeachment.

     

Senate President Bill Harris says that talk of impeachment is unwarranted. The Republican says he does not think there will be an attempt to impeach the governor. Taft says he won't resign.

     

      (Copyright 2005 by The Associated Press.  All Rights Reserved.)

Thursday, August 11, 2005

Arnold '06: Governor cashing in on Rolling Stones

Governor cashing in on Rolling Stones
For $100,000, you can watch concert with Schwarzenegger
Carla Marinucci, Chronicle Political Writer
Thursday, August 11, 2005
·

View article online-


Here's the ticket: a private evening rockin' the night away with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger during the kickoff of the Rolling Stones' "A Bigger Bang'' U.S. tour on Aug. 21 at Boston's Fenway Park.
Here's the bottom line: $10,000 a pop to get in on a private preconcert reception and front-and-center seats to watch the show -- or $100,000 to sit with the governor in his luxury box.
The eyebrow-raising event is one of a cluster of glitzy fundraisers the star-power governor will headline in the next few weeks as he seeks to arm his campaign fund with $50 million in preparation for the Nov. 8 special election -- which will determine the fate of his political agenda and, observers say, his chances for re-election in 2006.
Marty Wilson, the governor's chief fundraiser, said Wednesday that Schwarzenegger has planned about half a dozen state events and other fundraisers coast to coast this month and next.
"We have a very ambitious finance plan that will go a long way to helping us meet our overall fundraising goals -- and be in a position to fund our television campaign this fall,'' Wilson said Wednesday.
The Rolling Stones benefit, limited to 40 lucky fans, comes thanks to a donation of a rare block of center-stage seats and a luxury box to the group's 2005 tour kickoff -- courtesy of mortgage lender and mega-political donor Ameriquest. The company, based in Orange, is the lead sponsor of the Stones' 2005 tour and has written $1.5 million in checks to Republican Schwarzenegger's campaign coffers to date.
In political circles, where competitive fundraisers are continually inventing new ways to vacuum up cash, the unusual Stones benefit looks like a first.
Aggressive fundraising
While it's not uncommon to have rockers donate their services to politicians -- as Bruce Springsteen did for John Kerry in the last presidential campaign -- or for politicians to greet supporters at big- ticket events such as the Super Bowl, the marriage of a political leader, a must-see concert and what is arguably the world's most famous rock band dramatizes Schwarzenegger's unusual profile. And it highlights the aggressive measures he is taking to generate campaign cash.
"Politicians are always looking for more ways to raise money -- but Schwarzenegger is one of those pushing the envelope and raising money in ways with a vigor that ... we don't often see,'' said Steve Weiss, spokesman for the Washington-based Center for Responsible Politics.
"Schwarzenegger is using his celebrity to his advantage,'' he said, but increasingly it appears at odds with the candidate who "ran a campaign in which he said he would not be beholden to special interests.''
The governor and committees backing his ballot measures had spent more than $23 million during the first six months of the year, according to the most recent disclosure statements released last month. Groups opposing the governor's measures that would change teacher tenure and the state budget process had spent slightly more than $10 million.
Schwarzenegger and first lady Maria Shriver liked the idea of sponsoring a Rolling Stones fundraiser because "he's apparently a big Stones fan,'' Massachusetts GOP activist Melissa Lucas told the Boston Herald.
The event was arranged after Ameriquest offered the governor more than three dozen center stage and luxury box seats for the Stones' first 2005 U.S. concert -- seats currently going for $1,600 each on ticket brokers' Web sites.
"We were offered an opportunity for some tickets we could have for fundraiser purposes,'' Wilson said. "It promised to be a very unique event and something our supporters would respond to.''
No involvement from band
Fran Curtis, the longtime publicist for the Rolling Stones, said by telephone from Toronto -- where they're preparing for the tour's start -- that the band itself had no role in the matter. "We knew he was coming, but nothing else,'' she said.
A spokesman for Ameriquest refused to comment on the arrangement. The company, he said, "has a policy of not commenting on its political contributions.''
The slew of scheduled fundraisers has delivered the governor's opponents ammunition to fire away at what they call an increasingly shameless hat-in- hand routine.
"Sounds like 'Sympathy for the Devil' to me," quipped Gloria Nieto, a Democratic National Committee member and director of the Lyon-Martin Women's Health Services Clinic in San Francisco.
"I'm calling him the Disgrace-inator,'' said Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Association, which has relentlessly protested Schwarzenegger's campaign events. "He spends all his time fundraising and not governing. It shows the depth of his desperation.''
And it may also prompt problems with members of the governor's conservative base if they take a dim view of Schwarzenegger's coziness with a band that sings anti-Bush lyrics in new songs like "Sweet Neo-Con." (Sample: "You call yourself a Christian/I call you hypocrite/You call yourself a patriot/Well, I think you're full of s -- .")
Wilson, the governor's fundraiser, emphasized that the concert "shouldn't be construed as an endorsement by the Rolling Stones.''
Schwarzenegger supporters said his Republican base will understand that the event will help him raise money to fight off the attacks of his critics, including the public employee unions that have spent millions on television attack ads.
"In all my work, I've never seen anyone, anyone so enthusiastic and committed,'' said Kristin Heuter, a leading GOP fundraiser for Schwarzenegger. "He loves what he does. ... He wants to finish the job he started for the people of California.''
Effect on voters questioned
But watchdogs say with all this activity, the governor is raising more questions and provoking concern about whose interests he will meet.
"Schwarzenegger ... has appeal in numerous parts of the country, and he's leveraging that to raise money in places far away from California,'' said Weiss of the Center for Responsible Politics. "The interesting question is why are the donors in, say, Boston, contributing to him? What is their interest in policies in California -- and how do those interests serve the voters?''

5 days in August
Some of the governor's scheduled fundraisers:
Aug. 17: A $500-per-person event at the National Orange Show in San Bernardino.
Aug. 18: A "private dinner" at the Sutter Club in Sacramento, where $100, 000 buys six VIP table tickets -- two tickets at the head table with the governor -- and three photos with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Aug. 19: A Lake Tahoe "evening of casual elegance" at Shakespeare Ranch in Glenbrook, Nev., sponsored by Nevada Gov. Kenny Guinn and other Nevada politicians. The $25,000-per-couple "Platinum" tickets buy a host reception, cocktail reception, photo with Schwarzenegger and seats at his table.
Aug. 20: A $25,000-per-person fundraising barbecue dinner in New Jersey with GOP gubernatorial candidate Doug Forrester.
Aug. 21: An evening at a Rolling Stones concert in Boston.
Chronicle political writer John Wildermuth contributed to this report.E-mail Carla Marinucci at cmarinucci@sfchronicle.com.

View article online-

New York Young Republican Club calls for boycott of CNN

For Immediate Release: August 10, 2005
Contact: Tracy Feldman (979) 229 0737
E-mail: PR@nyyrc.com

STATEMENT BY THE NEW YORK YOUNG REPUBLICAN CLUB, INC.
NYYRC Calls for Nationwide Boycott of CNN until it refuses to air
NARAL's defamatory ad concerning Supreme Court Nominee John Roberts

The New York Young Republican Club, Inc. ("NYYRC") is angered that
NARAL has produced, and CNN has committed to airing, advertisements
that falsely accuse Supreme Court Justice nominee John Roberts of
supporting "violent fringe groups and a convicted [abortion] clinic
bomber." The NYYRC demands that CNN cancel its commitment to air
the offending advertisement and asks that all persons of good will –
whether pro-choice or pro-life – boycott CNN until the network
promises to deny the libelous advertisement on-air time.

The offending ad, produced by the Pro-Choice group NARAL, is
designed to defeat the nomination of Judge Roberts by falsely
accusing him of "Fil[ing] court briefs supporting violent fringe
groups and a convicted clinic bomber." The ad entitled "Speaking
Out," began running on August 8th, and according to multiple
sources, NARAL plans to buy half a million dollars worth of airtime
in coming weeks on national cable networks, as well as on networks
in Maine and Rhode Island.

According to FactCheck.org, a nonpartisan/nonprofit project of the
Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania,
the ad was both "false" and "misleads when it says Roberts supported
a clinic bomber." Indeed, as the FactCheck.org release notes
read, "The ad fails to mention that the `court briefs' it mentions
are actually from nearly seven years before the abortion clinic
bombing talked about in the ad."

"Once more the left-wing fringe that has become the staple of
Hillary Clinton's Democratic Party has abandoned the truth in the
name of opposing our president," said NYYRC President Dennis
Cariello. "We must stand up to such falsity by boycotting those
outlets which wrongly elevate libel to the level of reasoned
argument. We must show CNN that the American public will no longer
support a network that has become the mouthpiece for lies and
deceit."

President Cariello also called on CNN's advertisers to "contact CNN
CEO Jonathon Klein and tell him that you don't appreciate your
products being associated with NARAL's dishonesty."

The NYYRC strongly hopes that CNN reconsiders the short-term gains
to be had from this $125,000 ad purchase by NARAL and considers the
values upon which it was allegedly founded – truth and accuracy in
reporting and presenting news and opinion to the public – to be more
important and not worth sacrificing for financial gain.

The New York Young Republican Club, Inc. is a not-for-profit
political organization that exists to bring Republicans aged 18 – 40
together to discuss the Republican Party platform and aid the
Republican Party in the education of the public about the Republican
agenda and the promotion of Republican candidates for office. To
find out more about the New York Young Republican Club, Inc. please
visit the website at http://www.nyyrc.com

Tuesday, August 09, 2005

Hackett to challenge Dewine?

From Politcs1.com
 
OHIO: Iraq War veteran and attorney Paul Hackett (D) -- fresh off his surprisingly narrow loss in the CD-2 special election -- acknowledges that the '06 US Senate race against incumbent Mike DeWine (R) is a possibility. Hackett is also considering a rematch against new Congresswoman Jean Schmidt (R) next year. Hackett captured 48% in the heavily Republican CD-2 race -- a district in which no Democrat had broken the 40% mark in years (Kerry won just 35% there last year). Congressmen Ted Strickland (D) -- the leading Democrat in next year's open gubernatorial contest -- said he would support Hackett if Congressman Sherrod Brown and Tim Ryan both pass on the race.

Monday, August 08, 2005

Blackwell's TEL Amendment to File for November 2006 Ballot

Blackwell's TEL Amendment to File for November 2006 Ballot

After Talks with Legislators and GOP Chair Bennett;
“Issue Deserves Greatest Possible Debate,” says Blackwell
Monday, August 08, 2005
By: Gene Pierce


(Columbus, August 8, 2005) Citizens for Tax Reform today announced it will file its petitions to place a constitutional amendment to limit government spending on the November 2006 General Election ballot. The committee now intends to file its Tax Expenditure Limitation (TEL) Amendment petitions August 11, 2005, by-passing the August 10 deadline for this November’s ballot.

"After consultation with legislative leadership, Ohio Republican Party Chairman Bob Bennett and TEL supporters, the committee decided this issue deserves the widest possible exposure and debate," said Citizens for Tax Reform Honorary Chairman, Ohio Secretary of State Ken Blackwell. "The 2006 General Election ballot gives Ohio voters that opportunity.”

"I intend to be the GOP nominee for Governor and expect this amendment to be a major element of my platform of fiscal restraint for government and job creation for the private sector," said Blackwell.

Ohio GOP Chairman Bob Bennett added, “I applaud Ken Blackwell’s leadership on this issue, and his decision to move the proposed amendment to the gubernatorial ballot is a service to the voters of Ohio. It gives Ohioans an opportunity to hear substantive debate on a major policy initiative before making a decision that impacts all of state government.

“This gesture by Secretary Blackwell will allow us to focus our resources this year on defeating the special interest amendments being pushed by pro-Democrat unions and liberal activist groups.”

Citizens for Tax Reform will submit more than 500,000 signatures and will exceed county distribution thresholds in 69 of Ohio's 88 counties. State law requires 322,899 valid signatures for a constitutional amendment, reaching qualifying thresholds in 44 counties.


###


 

The Real History of the Crusades

During the current conflict with Islamic fascist terrorists, many including an incredibly misinformed former-U.S. President have stated that the cause of Islamic hatred to the West is the "unprovoked aggression" of the Crusades.

This was discussed on this afternoon's edition of the Michael Medved radio show -

(visit Medved's website here-http://www.michaelmedved.com )

Medieval scholar Thomas F. Madden writes an article in Crisis magazine, originally published in April 2002, which explores the history of the Crusades in a historically accurate perspective.

View entire article online--

http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2002/cover.htm

The Real History of the Crusades
By Thomas F. Madden

With the possible exception of Umber Eco, medieval scholars are not used to getting much media attention. We tend to be a quiet lot (except during the annual bacchanalia we call the International Congress on Medieval Studies in Kalamazoo, Michigan, of all places), poring over musty chronicles and writing dull yet meticulous studies that few will read. Imagine, then, my surprise when within days of the September 11 attacks, the Middle Ages suddenly became relevant.

As a Crusade historian, I found the tranquil solitude of the ivory tower shattered by journalists, editors, and talk-show hosts on tight deadlines eager to get the real scoop. What were the Crusades?, they asked. When were they? Just how insensitive was President George W. Bush for using the word "crusade" in his remarks? With a few of my callers I had the distinct impression that they already knew the answers to their questions, or at least thought they did. What they really wanted was an expert to say it all back to them. For example, I was frequently asked to comment on the fact that the Islamic world has a just grievance against the West. Doesn’t the present violence, they persisted, have its roots in the Crusades’ brutal and unprovoked attacks against a sophisticated and tolerant Muslim world? In other words, aren’t the Crusades really to blame?

Osama bin Laden certainly thinks so. In his various video performances, he never fails to describe the American war against terrorism as a new Crusade against Islam. Ex-president Bill Clinton has also fingered the Crusades as the root cause of the present conflict. In a speech at Georgetown University, he recounted (and embellished) a massacre of Jews after the Crusader conquest of Jerusalem in 1099 and informed his audience that the episode was still bitterly remembered in the Middle East. (Why Islamist terrorists should be upset about the killing of Jews was not explained.) Clinton took a beating on the nation’s editorial pages for wanting so much to blame the United States that he was willing to reach back to the Middle Ages. Yet no one disputed the ex-president’s fundamental premise.

Well, almost no one. Many historians had been trying to set the record straight on the Crusades long before Clinton discovered them. They are not revisionists, like the American historians who manufactured the Enola Gay exhibit, but mainstream scholars offering the fruit of several decades of very careful, very serious scholarship. For them, this is a "teaching moment," an opportunity to explain the Crusades while people are actually listening. It won’t last long, so here goes.

Misconceptions about the Crusades are all too common. The Crusades are generally portrayed as a series of holy wars against Islam led by power-mad popes and fought by religious fanatics. They are supposed to have been the epitome of self-righteousness and intolerance, a black stain on the history of the Catholic Church in particular and Western civilization in general. A breed of proto-imperialists, the Crusaders introduced Western aggression to the peaceful Middle East and then deformed the enlightened Muslim culture, leaving it in ruins. For variations on this theme, one need not look far. See, for example, Steven Runciman’s famous three-volume epic, History of the Crusades, or the BBC/A&E documentary, The Crusades, hosted by Terry Jones. Both are terrible history yet wonderfully entertaining.

So what is the truth about the Crusades? Scholars are still working some of that out. But much can already be said with certainty. For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression—an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.

Christians in the eleventh century were not paranoid fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them. While Muslims can be peaceful, Islam was born in war and grew the same way. From the time of Mohammed, the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the Abode of Islam and the Abode of War. Christianity—and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion—has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under Muslim rule. But, in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion of power and wealth. As the faith of the Roman Empire, it spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years.

With enormous energy, the warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed’s death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt—once the most heavily Christian areas in the world—quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The old Roman Empire, known to modern historians as the Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their brothers and sisters in the East.

Read entire article online-

http://www.crisismagazine.com/april2002/cover.htm

Saturday, August 06, 2005

Canada and Denmark in tug of War over arctic island

A friend of mine who has been travelling extensively in Canada on business mentioned this Hans Island conflict, and because there has been absolutely NO coverage in the U.S. I started thinking that he was pulling my leg.

A quick search engine inquiry, and viola!  Interesting stuff going on north of the border!
        -RonL

Hans Island the tip of iceberg in Arctic claims

CTV.ca News Staff

Defence Minister Bill Graham set off a diplomatic row with Denmark when he re-stated claim to tiny Hans Island in the far north last weekend, but what's really at stake is Canadian sovereignty over more important sites in the Arctic.

"Hans Island itself is a small and economically insignificant piece of rock," Rob Heubert, an Arctic expert with Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, said on CTV's Question Period.

Heubert believes Graham's move was a bold and necessary response to a series of provocations made earlier by the Danes.

"If we're not firm with Hans Islands, which by the way is the only sovereignty issue that concerns land, we're going to be setting up a terrible precedent for remaining issues that are very significant for Canadian Arctic sovereignty."

The United States is challenging Canadian sovereignty in six other areas of the Arctic, including the Northwest Passage.

If sea ice continues to thin due to climate change, the Northwest Passage will eventually open up as a major shipping route. More and more, the U.S. and other countries believe that the Arctic waters are international waters -- as is the case in the Antarctic.

Retired Colonel Pierre Leblanc, a former commander of the Northern Area, says Canada may have already lost its claim to the Arctic waters, due reports over the past 30 years of unidentified submarines being spotted in the area.

"There are quite a number of submarine sightings, some by very credible sources such as RCMP officers," Leblanc said.

The fact that Canada hasn't had the resources to conduct surveillance in the area, and track down these submarines, diminishes the Ottawa's claim to sovereignty.

Graham, also appearing on Question Period, told CTV's Craig Oliver that Canada should be in place to patrol the waters, as the Northwest Passage opens up.

Graham said Canada hasn't had a continuous presence in the Arctic because the times didn't require it, but that's all about to change. "These are new times and there will be new measures," Graham said.

"We have new satellites that we're putting in place to patrol the Arctic, and we will be looking at the use of unmanned aerial vehicles. And we're looking at the way in which we can extend a radar protection which we have off the east and the west coast, to put it at the either end of the Northwest Passage so that we could control and ascertain what traffic is taking place there," Graham said.

"So as time goes on ...  just as new technology is enabled other people to use submarines, new technology is enabling us to take better measures to patrol our Arctic."

 

View article and map of disputed island online;

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1122832179594_34/?hub=Canada

 

Canadian military plans summer Arctic mission

CTV.ca News Staff

Canada may be pulling back from overseas military commitments, but is planning to "flex its muscles" with an exercise on home soil by sending a warship, a squadron of helicopters and 200 troops to the high Arctic this summer.

News of the operation was reported in Saturday's edition of The National Post.

The military says the three-week long exercise has nothing to do with a brewing territorial dispute with Denmark over the ownership of a tiny island between Ellesesmere Island and Greenland.

The operation, code-mamed Narwhal, is the first time the military will have a joint naval, air and land force operating so far north.

Colonel Norris Pettis, commander of the Canadian Forces northern area, told The National Post that the operation is about "sending a message that this land is important to us...that we can put troops, and aircraft and ships, on the ground to respond to whatever we might be called upon to deal with."

Pettis said the "robust" military presence is a sign that Canada is "flexing our muscles" in the Arctic.

The Danish ambassador to Canada, Svend Roed Nielsen, has offered to negotiate with Canadian diplomats about the fate of Hans Island, a three-kilometre-long stretch of rock and ice in the Nares Strait.

Both countries claim ownership of the barren and uninhabited island.

"As far as Canada-Danish relations are concerned we have tried to keep this low-key [but] we have agreed to disagree," Foreign Affairs spokesman Reynald Doiron told the Post.

A Danish warship sailed past Hans Island in 2002 and a group of soldiers disembarked and reportedly hoisted the Danish flag, an act Canada claimed was a violation of its sovereignty.

Canada has launched a five-year plan to increase its military presence throughout the Arctic, including satellite surveillance and far-reaching patrols of soldiers on snowmobiles.

Denmark calls for talks on Arctic island dispute

CTV.ca News Staff

Denmark's government held out on olive branch over a barren Arctic island, suggesting talks with Canada to resolve the decades-old territorial tug of war.

A Foreign Affairs official said Ottawa would examine any formal request but was in no hurry to reopen talks.

The Danes had called it "an occupation", when Canada's Defence Minister Bill Graham visited the uninhabited, 1.3-square-kilometre Hans Island last week.

Both countries claim sovereignty over the barren rock, which lies between Canada's Ellesmere Island and Greenland, a semi-autonomous Danish territory.

Graham declared it "part of Canadian territory," sparking an immediate protest from the Danish government. And on Tuesday, a key government official in Greenland reacted angrily to Graham's comments.

"When someone unfairly tries to exercise their influence on the island, which is claimed by both Greenland/Denmark and Canada, I can't interpret the action as anything but occupation," Josef Motzfeldt, deputy leader of Greenland's home rule government, was quoted as saying on a Danish website.

Reports in the Danish press say the country expects to send a ship to the area next month.
Graham continues to portray his visit as innocent because he happened to be in the area. He's been touring Arctic posts, including Iqaluit, Pond Inlet and Alert, as part of the government's new emphasis on northern sovereignty.

Graham says Ottawa will talk to Denmark about his visit, but emphasized that Hans Island is part of Canada.

"We'll talk to the Danish people about their position, but our position has always been clear: It's Canada, and I went there just as I would have gone anywhere else in the Arctic," he said.

A statement from the Danish foreign ministry said Graham's visit, made without prior notice to Denmark, was "noted with regret."

Denmark sent navy ships to the island in 2002, and the following year hoisted a Danish flag there.

Canada has become increasingly assertive about its sovereign claim to the Arctic because of global warming's potential impact on mining and shipping.

More than 360 Canadian Forces sailors and soldiers participated in a northern sovereignty exercise last summer.

Canada's primary military presence in the Arctic is the Rangers -- the more than 4,000 aboriginals who use traditional survival skills, snowmobiles and vintage rifles to patrol all the way to the magnetic North Pole.

The two countries drew a border in 1973 halfway between Ellesmere Island and Greenland. They agreed that sovereignty over Hans Island and other Arctic islands would be determined later.

Denmark's claim is based on their argument that the island is closer to Greenland than to Ellesmere.

Canada says the Arctic islands were discovered by the British, whose rights Canada inherited following Confederation.

Canada, Denmark clash in Google ads

Associated Press

TORONTO — Canada and Denmark have taken their diplomatic tussle over a lump of Arctic rocks to the Internet with competing Google ads claiming sovereignty over Hans Island.

Some Canadians have called for a boycott of Danish pastries the way Americans disdained french fries when Paris declined to join the coalition forces in Iraq.

The diplomatic debate began Monday when Denmark said it would send a letter of protest over a visit to the 1/2-square-mile Hans Island last week by Canadian Defense Minister Bill Graham.

Graham stated Canada has always owned the uninhabited chunk of land, 680 miles south of the North Pole.
Denmark responded: "Hans Island is our island."

Toronto resident Rick Broadhead googled the matter and found an ad that touted Hans Island as Danish. "Does Hans sound Canadian? Danish name, Danish island."

Internet users clicking on the ad were directed to the Danish Foreign Ministry's Web site.

So Broadhead paid for his own Google ad and created a Web site to promote Ottawa's sovereignty. His Google ad leads users to a fluttering Maple Leaf flag and plays the national anthem.

Broadhead's Web site outlines Canada's argument that Hans Island belonged to the British and became Canada's in 1867. The Danes say it is closer to Greenland than Canada and is therefore Danish soil.

In 1984, Tom Hoeyem, who was Denmark's minister for Greenland affairs, caused a stir when he raised a Danish flag on the island, buried a bottle of brandy at the base of the flag pole and left a note saying: "Welcome to the Danish island."

 
View Rick Broadhead's Pro-Canada Hans island site here.
 
 

Danish note to the Canadian Ambassador on Hans Island:                                                  
In a conversation today with Canada's ambassador to Denmark, the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs noted with regret that the Canadian Minister of National Defence had paid a visit to Hans Island without prior notification of the Danish Government. At the meeting the head of the Danish Foreign Ministry's Legal Service handed over a note to the Canadian ambassador reiterating the Danish Government's regret.

Denmark as well as Canada claim sovereignty over Hans Island which is situated approximately half way between Greenland and Ellesmere Island