National Homeland Security Knowledgebase Campaign websites

Friday, October 28, 2005

Alice Batchelder deep-sixed by Davidson

Alice Batchelder of the Sixth Circuit was deep-sixed by an old Ohio political rival, Republican National Committee co-chairman Jo Ann Davidson, Reports John Fund.

According to Fund's Wall Street Journal column, Ohio native Alice Batchelder was knocked out of consideration for the U.S. Supreme Court by former Ohio House Speaker Jo Ann Davidson, now a co-chair of the RNC.

See funds entire article here- http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007448

(The item on Bachelder-Davidson is in paragraph 13)




---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com/

Monday, October 24, 2005

Bush Picks Bernanke as New Fed Chief

From Fox News:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,173193,00.html

WASHINGTON — President Bush named Ben Bernanke, chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers, on Monday as his choice to succeed five-term Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan.

Calling him one of the most-cited economists in the world, Bush said Bernanke has an exceptional character and has done "path-breaking work in the field of monetary policy."

"He's earned a reputation for intellectual rigor and integrity. He commands deep respect in the global financial community. And he will be an outstanding chairman of the Federal Reserve," Bush said.

Speaking in the Oval Office flanked by Bernanke and Greenspan, Bush said Bernanke's credentials are impeccable and his reputation excellent. He also had high praise for the outgoing chairman.

"Ben will replace a legend, Alan Greenspan... For nearly two decades, Chairman Greenspan has shepherded our economy through its highs and lows ... He has dominated his age like no central banker in history. He has contributed a better life for all Americans. And I thank him for his service."

The president made note of the impact the Federal Reserve has across the world, calling it a "symbol of the integrity and the reliability of our financial system." He said Bernanke "is the right man to build on the record Alan Greenspan has established."

For his part, Bernanke said if confirmed by the Senate, his top goal will be to maintain continuity from Greenspan's tenure.

"I will do everything in my power, in collaboration with by Fed colleagues to help assure the continued prosperity and stability of the American economy," said Bernanke, a Harvard-educated economist.

"My first priority will be to maintain continuing with the policy and policy strategies under the Greenspan era," Bernanke added.

Responding to the announcement, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said he hoped Bernanke's objectives are free of politics.

"I look forward to the confirmation hearings to learn more about Mr. Bernanke's views on how the Federal Reserve should steer our economy free from political influence and interference," said Reid of Nevada. "It will be important that Mr. Bernanke demonstrate that he is committed to guiding the economy to produce results for all Americans rather than promoting partisan policies that benefit special interests and an elite few."

Sen. Chuck Schumer, who serves on the Senate Banking Committee that will receive the nomination, said he felt confident that Bernanke is a "careful, non-ideological person" who knows the Fed's job is to fight inflation.

"Chairman Bernanke's recent comments seeming to favor extending tax cuts without paying for them are troubling, but he assured me today that he was speaking only as the chairman of the President's Council of Economic Advisers," Schumer said after the president's announcement.

Bernanke, 51, served as a board member for the Fed between August 2002 and his nomination to head the president's economics team in April 2005. A former chairman of Princeton University's economics department, he was last seen with Bush in August at the president's ranch with several economic advisers.

The stock market appeared to like the news of Bernanke's nomination with the Dow Jones industrial average rising nearly 100 points after the news hit and keeping its gains in the early afternoon after the announcement was made.

At the Fed, Bernanke had pushed for the central bank to be more specific in its inflation objectives. Greenspan has opposed setting a numerical target for inflation. The prospective nominee also has championed openness at the Fed — a policy that Greenspan has also advanced prominently.

"Economics is a very difficult subject," Bernanke once said. "I've compared it to trying to learn how to repair a car when the engine is running."

Despite the difficulty of the topic, Bernanke appears to have excelled at economics. A summa cum laude graduate of Harvard University in 1975, he received his doctorate from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1979. While studying in Boston, he focused on the economic underpinnings of the Great Depression and the losing track record of the city's beloved baseball team, the Red Sox.

While differing on whether to set a target rate for inflation, Bernanke is considered an ideological partner to Greenspan, often being considered a second source into what Greenspan was thinking.

Greenspan, whose speeches have been known to affect the direction of the stock market in real time, was first appointed by Ronald Reagan in August 1987 to fill an unexpired term. He had said previously he could stay on past the Jan. 31 expiration date of his latest term, but had indicated he would like to retire on time.

If confirmed, Bernanke will have big shoes to fill. Greenspan is considered exceptionally adept at building consensus among the Fed board members and regional bank presidents who make up the 12-member Federal Open Market Committee, the group that decides the cost and availability of money and credit in the economy.

The Federal Reserve Board is responsible for developing monetary policy in the United States. The FOMC's most obvious decision-making comes in the form of setting short-term interest rates that affect everything from credit card borrowing to mortgage rates to car loans.

The FOMC has announced 11 consecutive quarter point interest rate hikes since June 2004 in an attempt to stave off inflation coming primarily from energy price increases. The current prime rate is 3.75 percent, not nearly as high as the rate when Greenspan took over 18 years ago.

Greenspan's influence over the direction of monetary policy has led to healthy economic growth in the United States throughout his tenure. Only twice — in 1990-91 following Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, and in 2001 after the Sept. 11 terror attacks — has the country turned toward recession.

Greenspan has long been fascinated by economics and monetary policy, running his own company Townsend-Greenspan, which served some of the country's top corporations, and then as chairman of the president's Council of Economic Advisers during the Ford administration.

He had originally been tapped for that post by Richard Nixon, who resigned before Greenspan took office.

The Fed chairman has been known to wade into the deep waters of economic data, from monthly box car loadings to steel production data to try to determine the future direction of the economy.

He pursued his Fed job in the same way, often calling economists at other agencies to discuss the fine points of the government statistics. He would rise early every morning for a two-hour soak in his bathtub, time he used to devour the latest government statistics and Fed staff memos on the economy.

Greenspan succeeded another Fed legend, Paul Volcker, who during his eight years at the Fed had pushed interest rates up to their highest level since the Civil War in a successful effort to break a decade-long bout of inflation — but also pushed the country into the deep 1981-82 recession.

Greenspan never had to resort to pushing interest rates so high, mainly because during his tenure inflation never soared to the double-digit rates that Volcker confronted. One of Greenspan's biggest impacts to the market was, beginning in 1996, to announce on the day of the FOMC's meeting whether it had changed interest rates.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com

Shame, Shame, Know Your Name


by Resa LaRu Kirkland

New Orleans was killed alright, but label this death suicide, not homicide. She survived the outside attack. What she couldn’t survive was the internal one.
Her own people struck the fatal blow…her own black people.

Yeah, I said it. It’s about time someone did.

I know, I know, you’re going to try to disarm and dismiss me with the “worst word in the English language: racism.” Problem is, that tired song has done enough damage to this country. If that’s the best you can do, sit down and shut up—you’re hopeless.

You see, truth isn’t racist, or sexist, or prejudiced in any way. It simply is. Only a fool or a liar fears the truth—those who are justifying and excusing the behavior of the blacks are both of these, with a little hypocrisy and cowardice thrown in the mix for good measure. The truth of this situation, no matter how many fits you throw, is that the rape, looting, murder, and mayhem was committed overwhelmingly by blacks. By blacks. By blacks. Get it? By blacks who are often deliberately targeting whites. Do you think they’ll be charged under Hate Crime Statutes? I don’t think so…blacks raping or killing whites is justified by our Politically Castrated system.

My black brothers and sisters, where were you in this fight? Why didn’t you condemning these people, calling for justice the same way I do whenever whites behave this way? Those of you who would defend this indefensible behavior are as guilty as those marauding gangs. For that, you should be ashamed of yourselves…I know I’m certainly ashamed of you.

Why did you behave this way? I know too many outstanding blacks, so it can’t be some genetic tendency. These blacks have the balls to call those in their race who are did those things wicked, and they do it in spite of their own people’s terrible treatment of them. They are lovers of the truth, and have little patience for those whose behavior slanders them by association. I’m sure there are many blacks out there who are as aghast as the rest of the world at those animals in the south—but let’s face it; that’s not as pretty to the NEOCOMMS as their black prey. After all, if blacks start taking responsibility for their actions, who can the Hippy Press use as their perpetual victim then?

Do you have any idea how disgusted America is with you right now? We came to help, not even needing to be asked, not caring about color, creed, religion, or even if you were an American…we came, and what did we get in return? You shot at us, you blamed us, and you quickly dismissed the truth about it being your own black mayor who screwed you. After all, we know that only whites do such things, right?

Since you’re going to label me as racist anyway, then I might as well state my piece. So here it is—but not only from me.

From my friend Lee Ellis:

“When a local Louisiana agency would not let the Red Cross in to help the people in the shelter, when the Governor would not allow the President to come in immediately with military help to rescue people with their helicopters and personnel, when the Black Mayor refused to use the school busses to save the poor people who had no cars or transportation to leave the area which would be flooded, when this same mayor demanded that he only wanted plush Greyhound busses to be sent to him for such work and then let hundreds of school busses stay in the parking lots unused and thus flooded and destroyed, when all this arrogance and corruption murdered and tortured so many people unnecessarily, then someone must speak up to prevent another tragedy like this. To try to cover this up as you protestors are doing is only going to allow more such disasters to happen!

“It is the millions of taxpayer dollars sent to Louisiana BEFORE the disaster that could have prevented this mass suffering; the money spent afterwards is being used only to help the poor victims of this deliberate corruption and ineptness. For over 40 years, this state has been a welfare state under the aegis of the new Democrats, also known as neocomms. Let's pray that they never control the USA as they want to…

“…This combat veteran of WWII fought to give you freedom, I did not fight in vain so that some people could help those bent on creating more disasters for our people though greed, arrogance and self-serving interests…

“…Your brother believes in patriotism and God. That is a blessing. But God gave us the intelligence and free will to help people before they are hurt and to not to do this is a sin, indeed. Patriotism is also the need to protect America from the corrupters who would destroy society! Let us all try to reverse the 40 years of corruption that hurt so many people in Louisiana and let such corruption NOT spread across America!”

From my friend Darrell Colley, Jr., Universal City, TX:

“My wife and I worked at the Windsor Park Mall on Sunday. Bought $150 worth of hygiene items and took them there. A lot of sadness and grief...

“…This week, San Antonio has seen two rapes in the Windsor Park Mall relief center. Tuesday two people were murdered in a motel and their car stolen. We are hearing that the police department has reason to believe that this was done by persons from a flood relief shelter. Same for a couple of other shootings and car jackings. Now on our city streets are gang members from Louisiana. All are black. Some of Jamaican background. Some wear berets... some wear Dr. Seuss hats. They have dreadlocks and belt buckles that signify gang membership. Local news media is not reporting any of this. A friend that works as a volunteer at Kelly USA (formerly Kelly AFB), indicates that women in that shelter are afraid because of what goes on there at night.

“I hear the commentary about how Katrina forced people into committing crimes. That is crap. For years we went to New Orleans and it was going on then…And now that evacuees are here (and out of harms way), they are doing the same gangster crap that they did in Louisiana.

“For stand up folks that have given and given and given to inherit a bunch of thugs is not a good out come. Whether the New Orleans P.D. has data bases up and running that include priors and photos is not known, but what is obvious is that the drug based gang culture of New Orleans is going to run into the San Antonio Mexican Mafia drug based culture...and there are going to be wars on our streets as the two elements attempt to control the drug traffic in South Texas.

“Wondering if this same mess exists at other locations where evacuees have been situated and whether you can pull that info together to make the nation aware of what is going on.”

It does, Darrell…unfortunately. And I wouldn’t put much faith in the NOPD—their own are as knee deep in the anarchy as the civilians. You’ve all seen the video.

Why is it that Florida had three of hurricanes and managed to behave like human beings? Do I need to remind you that there were more whites than blacks in those areas? Is that the perception you WANT to create, black America—that a largely black community shouldn’t be expected to act with any type of class or decency? Why, black America, would you selfishly and brutally commit suicide like this, and drag your innocent black brethren with you?

Hold your chants of “Racist Bitch!” just a little longer. My Muslim contact gets the last word. You see, he is viewing all of this from another country, and another perception. This is what the world sees when they look at us. (Oh, and he’s a dark-skinned man from another land…so somehow that makes it not racist for him to say this. I know it doesn’t make sense…but then, that’s Political Castration for you.)

“African Americans make up 15% of the population, yet they make up 68% of prison inmates. I have seen programs by people like Jesse Jackson and a disgusting standup comedy show by Chris Rock; they made clear what mainstream thought is among the African American community. Unfortunately, people like Bill Cosby are few and far between, and their message is usually not received kindly by people of their own community. Why is it that hip-hop and 'gangster rap' gets such mainstream approval, whereas the analog to it in 'white music', the so-called deathmetal or blackmetal is a very niche phenomenon?

”Black people in America (or for that matter any poor person in America) is still FAR better off than people of the middle classes of most countries. As an example, I'll quote the figures for the country my best friend here comes from. The 'purchasing power parity' for a person in an African country with purchasing power parity almost 30 times less than the US is $1,200, whereas it is $40,100 for Americans. This means that the AVERAGE person in the US has 33 times more buying power (purchasing power parity is normalized so this statement is true even with higher cost of goods in the US) then an average person there. Furthermore, 12% of the people are living below the poverty line in the US, compared to 33% of the people in my friend’s country.

”But if my African friend can be the first position holder in one of the best engineering schools in Europe, and his sister can be a heart specialist under training while his family lives in a village, then I fail to see why black people in the US do not lift themselves up by their bootstraps! Other immigrant groups have done it in the US and elsewhere, look at the Chinese, Korean, Indian 1st and 2nd generation immigrants that are now running major corporations and are in government.”


Yep, it’s all white America’s fault that so many of you behaved like animals. For God’s sake, black America—grow up. Stop blaming others, stop the racism and demand better of your own race. I don’t think we should help you anymore until you help yourself, and not just to our stores. You’ve destroyed the world’s respect for you…it’s up to you to get it back. You should get on your knees and thank God for men such as Bob Parks, Alan Keyes, Larry Elder, Ken Hamblin…they are the great black—and white—hope. They have saved your name…you must end your shame.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com




Sunday, October 23, 2005

ALASKA THANKS YOU

By Nick Jans

As you stand at the gas pump this summer, think of Alaska. No, not as a fantasy to escape the heat or the price of your latest fill-up. Instead, consider that each spin of the pump's meter means money slurping north, straight from your wallet.

If you live in Texas, Georgia, Florida or New Jersey, that steady siphon is a certainty — your gas tax dollars are funding a procession of lavish road and bridge projects thousands of miles away, including a pile of boondoggles that we Alaskans don't need, and that many of us don't want.

It's a fact: For every dollar we Alaskans pay in at-the-pump gas taxes, we get $6.60 back, thanks to you generous, unwitting donors.

According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, a non-partisan watchdog group in Washington, that breaks down to $1,150 for every Alaskan in "earmark" funding for in-state projects alone, 25 times what the average American garners for his or her home state.

How could this be? Alaska is so rich that residents not only pay no state income tax, but we get individual yearly checks as our share of the oil wealth. Why should your gas taxes, which are supposed to fill potholes in your local interstate or repair your decaying bridges, end up so far from home?

Bringing it home

Simple. We have Don Young. You don't.

WHAT'S YOUR STATE'S TAKE?

As chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, our lone congressman has incredible clout in determining where federal funding (provided by your tax dollars) ends up. The six-year, $295 billion behemoth of a transportation bill was approved in the House of Representatives and easily passed in the Senate on Tuesday. Young has bragged that the bill is "stuffed like a turkey" with high-dollar projects earmarked for his home state, totaling $721 million. In fact, Young is so fond of the bill that he named it TEA-LU, after his wife, Lu.

Here's a sampling of projects for Alaska funded by the Transportation Equity Act:

• $223 million to build a bridge nearly as long as the Golden Gate and higher than the Brooklyn Bridge, to connect the town of Ketchikan (population 8,900) to the city airport on Gravina Island (population 50). Currently, the link is provided by a 10-minute ferry ride that has worked for years. This proposed project won Young a "Golden Fleece Award" from Taxpayers for Common Sense — an award he has told supporters he cherishes.

• $200 million for another "bridge to nowhere," which would lead from Anchorage, the state's largest city, to a rural port that has one tenant and a handful of homes. Total cost for the project has been estimated at upwards of $1.5 billion. Not even the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce wants it.

• $15 million to begin work on a 68-mile, $284 million access road to Juneau, the state capital, even though a majority of area residents have said they would prefer improving service in the existing ferry system instead. The proposed road would compromise so many ecologically sensitive areas that the Environmental Protection Agency, in an extremely unusual move, has stated its opposition to the project.

Of course, the ultimate beneficiaries are a handful of corporate interests (such as Couer Alaska, which is developing a large mine on the path of the proposed Juneau road), private individuals, timber companies and Young himself. By proving once again that he's Alaska's sugar daddy, the congressman cements his position for another term in office.

Meanwhile, transportation infrastructure across the nation suffers from neglect: More than 150,000 bridges, 7,500 miles of interstate highway and more than 28,000 miles of other roads are in immediate need of repair.

When both the arch-conservative Cato Institute and the ultra-green Sierra Club preach the same message — fix what's here before we build more — you know there's a problem.

Young is unfazed by any opposition, the essential unfairness of his actions, or the fact that he's squandering federal taxes at a time of record deficits.

"We make no apologies," he says. "If I hadn't done fairly well for our state, I'd be ashamed of myself."

His solution to budgetary shortfalls in TEA-LU? Rather than cut back, he actually proposed raising federal gas taxes further, though the notion failed for lack of support.

While Young may be the poster child for this new wave of tax-and-spend Republicans, he has plenty of company on both sides of the aisle. For example, Democratic Sens. Daniel Inouye of Hawaii and Robert Byrd of West Virginia share a legendary ability to bring home the bacon. And according to the watchdog organization Citizens Against Government Waste, Young's fellow Alaskan in the Senate, Republican Ted Stevens, consistently has led the entire congressional delegation in his ability to pack on the pork.

'Oinkers' in Congress

Paying homage to the senior Stevens' success, Young once told an Alaska audience, "I want to be a little oinker, myself."

The fact is, most legislators want to be oinkers. Their constituents expect them to use every shred of influence and power to direct every possible dollar of funding home, as if their political lives depend on it — which they do. Don Young isn't any different or worse; he's just better positioned.

Finally, the problem far transcends the boundaries of TEA-LU, the excesses of which are mere symptoms of a deeply flawed funding process in dire need of reform. Even funding for the war on terrorism, with national security at stake, is tainted by abuse and waste, as are armed services appropriations; congressmen fight with the same tooth-and-nail ardor over useless weapons systems, bases and facilities as they do over funding for bridges and bus stops.

The antiquated system of earmarking pork barrel projects based on seniority or clout is, in itself, a costly bridge to nowhere — one we can no longer afford. A fair formula for distributing federal funds is certainly within reach; all that would have been required to drastically cut and reform TEA-LU was a simple amendment to cull all earmarks. Despite a few modest rumblings, nothing was done. Unless action is taken in the final conference stage, it'll be up to the president to carry through his threat of a veto of this monument to waste and excess, sending it back to the House, back into Young's lap.

Focus down, and think about it next time you're standing at the gas pump, all you donors. That steady gurgle is the sound of your money draining away.

Alaskan writer Nick Jans is a member of USA TODAY's board of contributors. He also is author of the forthcoming book The Grizzly Maze.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com

Sunday, October 09, 2005

Shockwaves- MoveOnTaft.org

Shockwaves - MoveonTaft.org
Friday, October 07, 2005

From the American Policy Roundtable of Ohio:

The Roundtable has taken a step that has shocked a few people.

Word is getting out across the nation. The Roundtable made a move in Ohio that is creating a few shock waves. We thought you should hear the facts behind the headlines.

On August 18th, Ohio Governor Bob Taft was convicted on four counts of breaking state laws on full disclosure of gifts received from lobbyists and friends.

It was the first time an Ohio governor has ever been convicted of a crime while in office.

Even more disturbing, the Governor had fired others in his administration for failing to disclose the same kind of information he disregarded.

After much prayer, counsel and consideration, the Roundtable wrote the Governor and asked him to resign. We issued a call to all Ohioans to ask the Governor to step away from the public trust he has so badly mismanaged.

Now for some odd reason—many in the media are shocked that an organization standing for Judeo-Christian principles would go so far out on a limb–especially calling for the resignation of a Republican governor. After all, aren’t all people of faith die-hard Republican operatives in disguise? We have launched a website called MoveOnTaft.org. It lays out this whole issue for the people of Ohio and the nation.

It’s never easy to face our fallen nature. We all need God’s forgiveness. No elected official is perfect, nor do we expect them to be, but there comes a time when honor requires stepping aside.

That’s the stand we took. We wanted you to know.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com

Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Greenspan: The worst Fed chief ever

Contrarian Chronicles


The Fed chairman thinks the central bank has done a fabulous job during his tenure. I beg to differ. Let's set the record straight.

By Bill Fleckenstein

Alan Greenspan gave a speech last week titled "Economic Flexibility." It should have been called "Damn, I'm Good," because the world's biggest serial bubble blower -- and most incompetent, irresponsible Fed chairman of all time -- tried to rewrite history. My column today will endeavor to set the record straight.

At least he was nice enough to organize his speech so that the majority of objectionable material fell into seven or eight consecutive paragraphs, as he tried to set up Ben Bernanke (his likely successor) to be the fall guy for all of the problems that Greenspan and the rest of the yes-men at the Fed have precipitated.

He's got the dates but not the cause
I'll turn first to his brief 1990s synopsis, in which he claimed: "Yet the significant monetary tightening of 1994 did not prevent what must by then have been the beginnings of the bubble of the 1990s. And equity prices continued to rise during the tightening of policy between mid-1999 and May 2000."

His observation of when the mania really took hold and mine are exactly the same. It did start in late 1994. Of course, as with everything, he recognizes the end result but has absolutely no clue as to its cause. The reason for the continued rise in equity prices was that the Fed panicked in mid-1995 and reversed its tightening course after Orange County (and other leveraged entities) blew up. Next, the Fed bailed out the Asian crisis in 1997, Long-Term Capital Management in 1998 and fears of Y2K problems in late 1999.

Continuing on, he notes: "Indeed, the equity market's ability to withstand periods of tightening arguably reinforced the bull market's momentum." No, it was his endless bailouts that caused folks to believe in the notion of a "Greenspan put." Purely and simply, it was his practice of bailouts and market-cheerleading (which reached fevered pitch at the peak) that turned the boom to bubble.
Next, he follows up with this incredible statement: "The FOMC knew (my emphasis) that tools were available to choke off the stock-market boom, but those tools would only have been effective if they undermined market participants' confidence in future stability." To which I say: Correct, that is the idea. From time to time, you have to take away the punchbowl. But just remember that term "tools," because we'll see some examples shortly.

On to his summation of the aforementioned statements: "Market participants, however, read the resilience of the economy and stock prices in the face of monetary tightening as an indication of undiscounted market strength."

That's his lame excuse for why the market went up. Wrong.

High-tech is still the scapegoat
He then next turns to the dilemma the poor Fed was in: "By the late 1990s, it appeared to us that very aggressive action (my emphasis) would have been required to counteract the euphoria that developed in the wake of. …"

To finish that thought, Greenspan resorted to the cheerleading that he used at the height of the mania and then laid blame at the foot of "… extraordinary gains in productivity growth spawned by technological change," rather than his own bubble-blowing. As I read that, I am laughing, because it's just remarkable how he's still trying to insinuate that we were in a "new era." And that's what drove up stock prices, as opposed to his incompetence.

Highly allergic to accountability
His next comment: "In short, we would have needed to risk precipitating a significant recession, with unknown consequences. The alternative was to wait for the eventual exhaustion of the forces of boom." Got that? It was these unknown forces of boom -- not the Fed -- that precipitated the bubble. He followed up by saying: "We concluded that the latter course was by far the safer." What he means: We realized it was a bubble, but we didn't care because we assumed we could fix it.

So, the Fed understood the reality of the bubble while it was going on (though the Fed claimed not to at the time, a subject I discussed in my daily column last March). Nevertheless, Al said: "Relying on policymakers to perceive when speculative asset bubbles have developed and then to implement timely policies to address successfully these misalignments in asset prices is simply not realistic."

You read that right. It can't be done. It's impossible. Now, of course, it wasn't impossible. I wrote about it until I was blue in the face. Most people with an ounce of common sense knew there was a bubble under way. And, by what I've already shown, the Fed knew too. And yet, Greenspan is still trying to say that it would be unrealistic to attempt to identify bubbles.

In addition, he's ready to hide behind another excuse: "It is difficult to suppress growing market exuberance when the economic environment is perceived as more stable…" See? It's just too hard, and, as he already said: "We would have needed to risk precipitating a significant recession, with unknown consequences."

Rusting tools in Greenspan's garage
Even if any of his protestations were true (which I don't believe) and the Fed was afraid of damaging the economy, it has been granted specific tools to deal with periods of speculation. Among them: Regulation T, whereby margin requirements can be raised to reduce risk and change market psychology. (While raising margin requirements to even 100% may or may not have been sufficient to break the stock bubble, the Fed could have at least tried. If that failed, the Fed could then have tightened.) However, for Greenspan to pretend that all he could have done was to raise rates shows that either he doesn't know what the Fed's tools are (i.e., he's clueless) -- or he's not being truthful.

Also in its arsenal is Regulation X, which allows the Fed to set minimum requirements on mortgage down payments, as well as maximum repayment periods. (Regulations W and X, the former having to do with installment debt payments, were legislated in 1950.) Of course, when Greenspan wails about not wanting to hurt the economy with rate hikes, none of his lapdogs in the press ever seem to question why the Fed hasn't used the tools at its disposal.

In any case, part of my reason for re-titling Greenspan's speech is due to the following comment: "After the bursting of the stock market bubble in 2000, unlike previous periods following large financial shocks, no major financial institution defaulted, and the economy held up far better than many had anticipated (and we all lived happily ever after)."

Crowing belied by cutting
What I'd like to know is: If this was all so benign, why did he and helicopter copilot Ben Bernanke panic -- to the tune of 13 rate cuts, all the way down to 1% -- about the possibility of deflation in 2001 as the stock bubble unwound? Were it not for the even bigger, more dangerous housing bubble that Greenspan has in turn precipitated, which has only postponed the inevitable, the fallout would have been commensurate with the size of the boom.

He is right about no major financial institutions having defaulted -- though we did happen to lose Enron, WorldCom and Arthur Andersen in the process. But it was largely an equity-induced mania. And, as I've said many times, it did not leave behind a wave of bad debts. The housing bust will do just that.

Culpability, thy name is Greenspan
So, the fallout from the housing boom, the unfinished business from the stock boom and all the derivatives he's championed for his beloved deregulated financial system will combine to hit with full force somewhere down the road. By then, of course, Greenspan will be long gone. He, as well as everyone else who's incapable of understanding what really happened, will be blaming our problems on the next Fed chairman. I will have no sympathy for Ben Bernanke, assuming he moves from the White House Council of Economic Advisors to the Fed. But we must understand what actually took place and not let this arrogant buffoon get away with his attempt to rewrite history.

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the last I'll have to say about Alan Greenspan, once and for all -- until he makes me really mad.

Bill Fleckenstein is president of Fleckenstein Capital, which manages a hedge fund based in Seattle. He also writes a daily Market Rap column on his Fleckenstein Capital Web site. His investment positions can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com



Monday, October 03, 2005

Delusions by Michael Medved

—Michael Medved

The heavily-hyped anti-war protests in Washington at the end of September showed their detachment from reality in two ways. First, only the most delusional demonstrators could believe that President Bush would suddenly reconsider his Iraq policies after watching thousands of angry leftists surrounding the White House and calling him a Nazi mass murderer.

Second, how could the protestors make the case that the immediate withdrawal that they demand would make the U.S. in any way safer? By handing a gigantic victory to the most murderous, fanatical elements of fundamentalist Islam, U.S. abandonment of the new Iraqi regime would encourage terrorism while destroying all prospects for democracy.

Even congressional critics of the war recognize that an abrupt reversal of course at this point would damage American interests, but hysterical demonstrators hate Bush far more passionately than they love their country, and care more about expressing their rage than suggesting alternatives for U.S. policy.


Michael Medved is the host of The Michael Medved Show.

Michael Medved is the author of
Right Turns: Unconventional Lessons from a Controversial Life.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com

Sunday, October 02, 2005

Bennett Fires Back Against Racism Charges

WASHINGTON — Former Education Secretary William Bennett (search), harshly criticized by Democrats and repudiated by the White House for a comment he made suggesting that, in theory, crime would go down if more black babies were aborted, fired back at his critics Friday.

"Anyone paying attention to this debate should be offended by those who have selectively quoted me, distorted my meaning, and taken out of context the dialogue I engaged in this week. Such distortions from 'leaders' of organizations and parties is a disgrace not only to the organizations and institutions they serve, but to the First Amendment (search)," Bennett said.

"Let me reiterate what I had hoped my long career had already established: that I renounce all forms of bigotry — and that my record in trying to provide opportunities for, as well as save the lives of, minorities in this country stands up just fine," he added.

The conservative author, columnist and talk-radio host touched off a firestorm on Wednesday when a caller to his "Morning in America" show postulated that if abortion were illegal, Social Security would remain solvent.

Bennett raised questions about the caller's premise, saying that according to that logic, the argument in the book Freakonomics — that allowing abortion reduces crime — would be equally valid.

Referring to the book's hypothesis, Bennett told the caller, "I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down."

Bennett continued: "That would be an impossible, ridiculous and morally reprehensible thing to do. But your crime rate would go down."

Bennett's remarks on Wednesday earned him scorn from Democratic lawmakers.

"He's assuming that if you did this immoral thing, it would bring down crime and that is a possible solution," Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., told FOX News. "A good-thinking guy that is a former secretary of education could give the hypothetical that if you expose people to education," then you would alleviate the conditions that cause crime, he said.

"It again raises the specter of the not-so-subtle politics of race represented by 'Willie Horton,' welfare queens and the conclusion that America would be better off if Strom Thurmond had been successful in 1948," said House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer of Maryland.

"These are shameful words," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California said on the floor of the House Thursday evening. "Secretary Bennett's comments reflect a narrow-minded spirit that has no place within American discourse. These words do not give credence to the tremendously difficult past that African-Americans have endured. These words do not reflect the values of hope and opportunity for the future."

Asked for White House reaction to the remarks, press secretary Scott McClellan said Friday, "The president believes the comments were not appropriate."

Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., said of the White House comment: "Not appropriate is wearing white shoes after Labor Day. These comments were reprehensible and racist."

Lautenberg was introducing a resolution in the Senate calling on the chamber to condemn Bennett's comments.

The Subtleties of Race Relations

Bennett was education secretary under President Reagan and director of drug control policy when President Bush's father was president.

In discussing crime and race on his show, Bennett later said those are topics that "have been on many people's minds, and tongues, for the past month or so in light of the situation in New Orleans."

Many in public policy have speculated about the slow response to Hurricane Katrina, which struck more than a month ago, by the federal government, with much of the blame laid at Bush's feet. Several suggestions had been made that the president's response was delayed because those suffering most in New Orleans were poor and black.

The latest rhetorical slams were expanded last week at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation Conference when Rangel likened Bush to the late Bull Connor, the Birmingham, Ala., commissioner of public safety who had his workers turn fire hoses and police dogs on African-Americans demonstrating against segregation laws in 1963.

Rangel said Bennett, like Bush, could find solutions for impoverished black Americans if they bothered to address poverty issues.

"If the United States spent nearly as much time on poverty as they did in Iraq, we could solve some of the racial problems," Rangel said, adding that he did not think Bush is racist like Connor but that the president's "economic policies are so adverse to the questions of poverty" that he was hoping Bush's "indifference" to the plight of black Americans "would shake up the country the way that Bull Connor did."

On Thursday, Bennett, author of "The Book of Virtues," told FOX News that his remarks were to be viewed from the specter of academia and philosophic argument.

"To put forward a hypothesis, a morally impossible hypothesis, to show why it is morally impossible and reprehensible, seems to me is a standard way of talking about public policy and a standard way of teaching," he said.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com

Bush Mum on New Supreme Court Pick

Sunday, October 02, 2005
 
WASHINGTON — President Bush returned from Camp David Sunday to attend Red Mass at St. Matthew's Cathedral in Washington. The mass is held each year on the Sunday before the Supreme Court session begins.

Bush and first lady Laura Bush were joined by newly confirmed Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and several of the other justices in the centuries-old Roman Catholic prayer session held for justices, judges and government officials of all faiths.

At the Red Mass, named after the vestments worn by the priests, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick, the principal celebrant, delivered a homily wishing wisdom and greater civility in public discourse.

“We tend to blame each other, and the level of our discourse can sometimes become shrill and caustic and uneven,” he said, including the church in a list of institutions where civility can improve.

"I pray that that will continue (to show civility) because it is so important not just for good government, but for the good care of our people who look here to all of you and your colleagues for the kind of leadership that is not destructive or too intensely partisan," McCarrick said to the audience that included Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Chief of Staff Andrew Card, Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Bush counselor Harriet Miers. The latter two have been named as possible choices to be the next Supreme Court nominee.

See full article at:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171010,00.html

 

Transcript: Tom DeLay on FOX NEWS SUNDAY

Transcript: Rep. Tom DeLay on FNS
Sunday, October 02, 2005


WASHINGTON — 'FOX NEWS SUNDAY' HOST CHRIS WALLACE: We are joined now by our exclusive guest this Sunday, Congressman Tom DeLay (search), who had to step down this week as House majority leader after being indicted on a charge of criminal conspiracy.

Congressman, welcome.

REP. TOM DELAY, R-TEXAS: Thank you, Chris.

WALLACE: Thank you for talking with us.

DELAY: Thanks for the opportunity.

WALLACE: There's a lot of talk this week from Republicans and from the media that the DeLay era, as they call it, is over, that you will never again be, perhaps, the most powerful man on Capitol Hill.

Are you done as a major force in Congress?

DELAY: Oh, I don't think so.

This is a frivolous indictment. I am indicted just for the reason to make me step aside as majority leader. This is politics at its sleaziest, and people will recognize that and see it for what it is.

And we're just -- go through it. I think it will be over and be over very, very soon. And I think I will go back to be majority leader.

See Full transcript here

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171007,00.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Big World Blog Homepage- http://www.bigworldblog.com

Romney fuels presidential run speculation

By Alex Cukan
United Press International
Oct. 2, 2005 at 1:59PM

BOSTON, Oct. 2 (UPI) — Massachusetts, Gov. Mitt Romney, a Republican, has traveled out of state for political events at least 20 times and plans five more trips.
      Romney's appearances at political gatherings in New Hampshire, Iowa, Michigan, South Carolina, and six other states, has been fueling speculation he is planning to run for president, the Boston Globe reported Sunday.
      The governor's staff say few future trips have been confirmed, but many of the out-of-state trips keep him away only for short periods, and occur on weekends, holidays or after business hours.
      "The governor loves the job he's got," spokeswoman Julie Teer.
     "Like Ted Kennedy and John Kerry, Gov. Romney is a leader in his party and is frequently asked to help fellow Republicans raise money and speak at events."
      Romney has said he will announce this fall whether he will seek re-election as governor.

National Beer Wholesalers: proposed regulation invites deceptive information

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Michelle Semones or Erin Rutherford
800.300.6417
E-mail: Erin Rutherford
September 30, 2005
NBWA and more than 100 Members of Congress Tell TTB All Drinks are not Created Equal

ALEXANDRIA, Va. – More than 100 members of Congress have joined the National Beer Wholesalers Association (NBWA) in expressing their concerns to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) about a proposed rule that may allow deceptive and misleading information on alcohol beverage labels.

Letters were sent to the TTB in response to a proposed rule put forward by the bureau that would allow alcohol beverage labels to include descriptions of alcohol content per “standard serving” accompanied by graphics suggesting that all types of alcohol are equal. The graphic falsely suggests that there is no difference between one shot of liquor, one bottle of beer or one glass of wine. The label is an attempt by the spirits industry to further its “equivalency” agenda, seeking to blur the lines between the different licensed beverages.

In a letter, NBWA President David Rehr wrote, “Graphic equivalency logos and a ‘standard serving’ reference are deceptive and potentially dangerous to consumers.”

 
 

 

President's Radio Address: War in Iraq

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
October 1, 2005

President's Radio Address

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This week I met with the generals who are overseeing our efforts in Iraq -- Generals Abizaid and Casey -- to discuss our strategy for victory. They updated me on the operations in Baghdad last weekend in which Iraqi and coalition forces tracked down and killed the second most wanted al Qaeda leader in Iraq. This brutal killer was a top lieutenant of the terrorist Zarqawi. He was also one of the terrorists responsible for the recent wave of attacks in the Iraqi capital, which is part of the terrorist campaign to halt political progress in Iraq, by stopping this month's referendum on the Iraqi constitution.

Our strategy in Iraq is clear: We're hunting down deadly terrorist leaders. We're conducting aggressive counterterrorism operations in the areas where the terrorists are concentrated. We are constantly adapting our tactics to the changing tactics of the terrorists, and we're training more Iraqi forces to assume increasing responsibility for their country's security.

The growing size and increasing capability of the Iraqi security forces are helping our coalition address a challenge we have faced since the beginning of the war. It used to be that after we cleared the terrorists out of a city there were not enough qualified Iraqi troops to maintain control, so if we left to conduct missions in other areas of Iraq, the terrorists would try to move back in. Now the increasing number of more capable Iraqi troops has allowed us to keep a better hold on the cities we have taken from the terrorists. The Iraqi troops know their people and their language, and they know who the terrorists are. By leaving Iraqi units in the cities we have cleared out, we can keep those cities safe, while moving on to hunt down the terrorists in other parts of the country.

We used this approach recently in Iraq's northwest region where Iraqi and coalition forces targeted an area that was one of the main routes for foreign terrorists entering Iraq from Syria. During operations in the key town of Tal Afar, Iraqi security forces outnumbered coalition forces for the first time in a major offensive operation. Because of our joint efforts, hundreds of insurgents and terrorists have been killed, or captured, or flushed out, and our continued efforts will make it more difficult for foreign terrorists to enter Iraq.

As part of our strategy, Iraqi forces have stayed behind in Tal Afar to ensure that the terrorists cannot return and regroup. And coalition and Iraqi troops are pursuing the terrorists in western Iraq, working to deny al Qaeda a safe haven there, and to stop terrorists from crossing into the country through Syria.

I'm encouraged by the increasing size and capability of the Iraqi security forces. Today they have more than 100 battalions operating throughout the country, and our commanders report that the Iraqi forces are serving with increasing effectiveness. In fact, this week coalition forces were able to turn over security responsibility for one of Iraq's largest cities, Karbala, to Iraqi soldiers. As Iraqi forces show they're capable of fighting the terrorists, they are earning the trust and confidence of the Iraqi people, which will ensure the success of a free and democratic Iraq.

More difficult and dangerous work still lies ahead. The terrorists have a history of escalating their attacks before Iraq's major political milestones, and two elections are fast approaching. In two weeks, Iraqis will vote on a democratic constitution, and if that constitution is approved, they will return to the polls later this year to elect a fully constitutional government.

As Iraqis take these next steps on the path to freedom and democracy, the terrorists will do everything they can to stop this progress and try to break our will. They will fail. Defeating the terrorists in Iraq will require more time and more sacrifice. Yet all Americans can have confidence in the military commanders who are leading the effort in Iraq, and in the troops under their command. They have made important gains in recent weeks and months; they are adapting our strategy to meet the needs on the ground; and they're helping us to bring victory in the war on terror.

Thank you for listening.

END